reloppositive.blogg.se

Alpha console nvidia graphics cards comparison
Alpha console nvidia graphics cards comparison




alpha console nvidia graphics cards comparison

In Battlefield 4 at Ultra quality and 1080p the Alpha’s 27fps average was three frames behind the Syber, and the Alpha’s 44fps average in Bioshock’s top settings was four frames slower. The Alienware’s lesser processor and smaller RAM loadout made a difference in games tests. Syber’s machine also uses Core i3, but its i3-4160 is a full-fat part clocked to 3.6GHz. It uses Haswell, but it’s a low-power chip that tops out at 2.9GHz with no Turbo Boost. The Alpha’s mid-range graphics core is partnered with an Intel Core i3-4130T. Related: GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265 The graphics card has 2GB of dedicated memory, and our machine’s 4GB of DDR3 is installed in single-channel mode that will hamper speed – so its 6GB looks bad when compared to the 8GB of shared memory in each console. The memory configuration makes the situation murkier. It’s a mid-range part with 640 stream processors clocked to 1,020MHz – a configuration with a top theoretical throughput of about 1.4TFLOPS, which is less than the 1.84TFLOP peak of the PS4, but higher than the 1.31TFLOP maximum of the Xbox One. A big of legwork reveals that the Alpha’s silicon is based on the desktop GTX 750 Ti/GTX 860M chip – the same chip used in Syber’s system.

alpha console nvidia graphics cards comparison

Performance, Options and Verdict ReviewĪlienware’s website only lists the GPU as a generic Nvidia unit.






Alpha console nvidia graphics cards comparison